IN THE COURT
OF SESSION JUDGE LAHORE.
Shahnaz
Bibi Wife of Muhammad Rasheed Resident of Allah Hoo Masjid Ittefaq
Pura Badami Bagh
Petitioner
Versus
1. S.H.O. Police Station Badami
Bagh
Respondent
Petition
under section 22 . A, 22. B Cr.
P. C. read with section 25 Cr.p.c. for compliance
with the order dt:19-05-11 and under section 155-C of police order 2002 for
initiation of criminal proceeding against the respondent that he has violated
the order of the honourable court dt: 19-05-11.
MAY IT PLEASE YOUR
HONOUR:-
1.
That
abridgely the facts giving rise in the instant
petition are that the petitioner is a law abiding citizen of
2.
That
being aggrieved the petitioner moved a writ petition under section 22.A 22.B
Cr. p. c. before this honorable court, and honorable court pleased to announce
the order
3.
That
the petitioner again approached the respondent with the order of this honorable
court, but the respondent again totally refused to accept the order of this honorable
court and asked the petitioner that he can not accept this order, because these
orders are routine matter orders.
4.
That
the respondent has totally refused to accept the order of this honorable court,
and in this way he did contempt of court. And the act of the respondent is
against the law and the basic values and principles of justice, while on the
other hand it is crystal clear under the 154 cr. p. c that if the in charge of
a police station received any information of a cognizable offence writing or
oral, and if a cognizable offence made out he shell proceed further, and he has
no power to refuse for registration of a criminal case against the accused
person.
5.
That
the order of this honorable court is also crystal clear and honorable court
also relying upon the case law PLD. 2007 S.C.539 and 2008 YLR 2406
6.
That
the act of respondent is
very funny towards the order of this honorable court, and to strict action
would be taken against the respondent is necessary for the interest of justice.
PRAYER
Under these circumstances its most
humbly and respectfully prayed that the proceedings under contempt of the court
act may kindly be initiated against the respondent and be ordered to produce the F.I.R in the honorable
court as compliance of the order dt 19-05-11, and dealt him strictly in
accordance with law.
Any other relief which
the honorable court deems fit may also be awarded.
Petitioner
Through Counsel:
Mian Mohammad Saeed,
Advocate supreme court,
Dt : -
Ilyas
Ahmed Ghouri Tahir Rafique Aamir Akram
Waqar Mohammad M Sheraz Javaid Ghulam Abbas
Ch.Atif Gujjar
Khalid Bashir
Advocates High Court